Impossible worlds and partial belief
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Ontology of Impossible Worlds
The best arguments for possible worlds. as states of affairs furnish us with equally good arguments for impossible worlds of the same sort. I argue for a theory of impossible worlds on which the impossible worlds correspond to maximal inconsistent classes of propositions. Three objections are rejected. In the final part of the paper, I present a menu of impossible worlds and explore some of the...
متن کاملMarcus on Belief and Belief in the Impossible
I review but don’t endorse Marcus’ arguments that impossible beliefs are impossible. I defend her claim that belief’s objects are, in some important sense, not the bearers of truth and falsity, discuss her dispositionalism about belief, and argue it’s a good fit with the idea that belief’s objects are Russellian states of affairs.
متن کاملA Classically-Based Theory of Impossible Worlds
a in the sense of ‘intensional’ that Yagisawa finds objectionable (i.e., having nonextensional identity conditions). On the present theory, though properties and relations are conceived intensionally (i.e., necessarily equivalent ones are distinguishable), they still have extensional identity conditions. It was noted in the first section of the paper that it is a consequence of our theory that ...
متن کاملImpossible worlds and logical omniscience: an impossibility result
In this paper, I investigate whether we can use a world-involving framework to model the epistemic states of non-ideal agents. The standard possible-world framework falters in this respect because of a commitment to logical omniscience. A familiar attempt to overcome this problem centers around the use of impossible worlds where the truths of logic can be false. As we shall see, if we admit imp...
متن کاملQuantified Logic of Awareness and Impossible Possible Worlds
Among the many possible approaches to dealing with logical omniscience, I consider here awareness and impossible worlds structures. The former approach, pioneered by Fagin and Halpern, distinguishes between implicit and explicit knowledge, and avoids logical omniscience with respect to explicit knowledge. The latter, developed by Rantala and by Hintikka, allows for the existence of logically im...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Synthese
سال: 2017
ISSN: 0039-7857,1573-0964
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-017-1604-8